The industry is all a buzz about employer branding these days, and with good reason: The labor market is tightening, and today’s discerning job applicants turn to Twitter, LinkedIn, and employer review sites for a peek behind the company curtain.
These sites and social platforms have become a destination for potential candidates to learn how companies actually function (or dysfunction) judging from employee feedback and fellow applicants’ candid reviews of the candidate experience. In our Employer Branding Study we found that 75% of job seekers consider an employer’s brand before even deciding to apply for a job. But how does a company go about shaping, or reshaping, its brand? We see employer brand being molded by four main areas of influence – company culture, employee opinions, candidate opinions, and the corporate brand. While corporate brand and company culture are driven from within the organization, employee and candidate opinions are based on direct experience and interaction with an employer and reflect not only how an employer treats its people, but reveal a company’s values and ethics which guide their business decisions. Talent acquisition professionals today are ever pushed to straddle the line of marketer and recruiter, what we termed the “HR-Marketer hybrid.” Hiring professionals who are just starting to take on these hybrid roles are fast becoming the experts and leaders of employment branding in their organization. Related: 3 Signs You’re a Pro at Social Recruiting We view the HR-Marketer placed strategically at the intersection of these four corners of employer brand, helping shape and communicate the company culture and corporate brand to the candidate audience, and ensuring those values are truly reflected in the candidate and employee experience. These four areas of employer brand influence are regularly debated and are themselves quickly evolving. Here are the latest, relevant news pieces to show how these areas are being studied, perceived, and reshaped:
The majority of candidates’ opinions focus on their candidate experience–a term now so widely used in the talent space that this recent ERE piece says what many of you have been thinking: I’m Tired of Hearing About Candidate Experience. The author believes a positive candidate experience can directly and positively impact a company’s bottom line. What’s his main gripe? Companies who tout the importance of treating candidates well, but lack the structure and systems to address the real gaps in the candidate experience.
Corporate Brand
Your corporate brand on social media communicates more than the copy and images you place on your profile pages. Often it’s how you communicate, not what you communicate, that defines and delivers your talent brand message. This post by Entrepreneur sums up the four mistakes your social media profiles might be committing with job seekers. This piece covers what you could be doing wrong, but how do you know you’re doing it right? Read the three signs you are a pro at social recruiting and see if you’re optimizing your employer branding and hiring efforts on social.
Tallulah David / About Author
Tallulah David is the former VP of content and product marketing at CareerArc. She has led marketing, PR, and content programs for a variety of tech companies spanning from HR tech, software security, e-commerce, and consumer electronics.
Before they were creating a memorable experience for job candidates, Marta Riggins and Colleen Finnegan were curating unforgettable concert experiences…
The age of social media has changed how we’ve gone about recruiting talent. We don’t own employer brand. It’s owned…
14 Apr 2015
We have recently updated our privacy policy. We use cookies for website functionality, analytics, and advertising. Click "Accept" to agree to our cookies or find out how to manage cookies in our privacy policy.